by Nick Economou
The federal Labor caucus has decided to put aside its disdain for former leader Kevin Rudd and return him to the Labor leadership. The reason for this is simple: with Julia Gillard as leader, Labor was heading to a massive electoral defeat in both the House of Representatives and probably the Senate as well.
Kevin Rudd, it seems, is being viewed as the party’s only hope to avert electoral disaster. Here something of interesting transition in caucus’ thinking has occurred reflecting how dire is the party’s situation in the polls.
The last time Rudd was talked about as leader those advocating his return spoke of his ability to win an election. Now the hope is that Rudd can simply avert a disaster.
Questions now arise as to what happens next. Rudd’s return to the prime ministership will be followed by a ministerial re-shuffle. Given the antipathy that exists between Rudd and so many of the current front bench, the change in personnel in the government will be extensive.
There will be many casualties with Wayne Swan, the treasurer under Gillard, arguably being the most senior. Of not unrelated interest will be any change in the new Rudd government’s approach to the policy debate, and here it will be interesting to see if the carbon tax survives.
It will also be interesting to see what happens when the new Rudd leadership subjects itself to a parliamentary session. There might be dangers in Rudd going to the lower house to confront the cross-bench independents, especially if they were to decide to indicate a willingness to support Tony Abbott as prime minister.
In such a situation Rudd would have to tend his resignation to the governor-general and advise her to call on Abbott to form a ministry. Opposition leader Tony Abbott could then go to the next election as prime minister. Clearly there are important constitutional issues associated with the leadership transition and the role of the governor-general could be crucial in determining exactly when the election will be held and who the prime minister will be.
The Liberal-National opposition have been baying for an August 3 election, but that was when Gillard was prime minister. Were Rudd to move to an immediate election the opposition would be denied the opportunity to attack the new government in the parliament.
Rudd would also be hoping to exploit a bounce in support for Labor amongst the electorate that has been hinted at by the opinion polls. Once the election is called Rudd and Abbott would be locked in a policy debate and the controversies associated with the theatre of the parliament – including the contribution of a number of the independents some of whom have decided to retire rather than face their constituents – would be overshadowed. Expect an August election.
The resurrection of Rudd is all about the Labor party being influenced by opinion polls. These polls indicated that Labor MPs holding seats with margins up to 10% could be defeated. This has clearly influenced the thinking of a number of Labor MPs who voted for Gillard in the last leadership ballot.
These polls have been indicating that Labor is in serious trouble in every state except Victoria (but even in that state there have been signs of a corrosion of support especially in seats beyond inner Melbourne). In Queensland, NSW, South Australia and (at least according to Newspoll) Western Australia the collapse in primary support for Labor is at such low levels that, if they were replicated in the Senate, the Coalition would be in with a chance to win control of the upper house.
The critical question now is how the Australian electorate responds to what has happened. For all the drama of the leadership transition, the fact remains that the ALP has done nothing to dispel the notion that it is at war with itself. Labor strategists will be hoping that something of a euphoric response to Rudd’s return translates in to voter support.
The chances are that it will not. As a former Labor leader who was himself the victim of a challenge once put it, you can’t expect people to vote for you to run the country if you can’t run yourself.
Dr Nick Economou is a Senior Lecturer in the School of Political and Social Inquiry at Monash University.
This article has appeared in The Conversation.
Internship Project with MWorld: Educational App
Monash University is currently undertaking an exciting project to make available quality, trusted content to…
Crossing the US-Mexico border on foot
By Brandy Cochrane A line of people snakes out in front and behind, evoking the…
Monash Art Ensemble – New CD review – 5* The Australian
Monash Art Ensemble (Australian Art Orchestra & Sir Zelman Cowen School of Music) THIS comprehensive…
At war with the media
With Australian troops returning from Afghanistan, a new book focuses on media coverage of the…
Prato / Villa I Tatti Conference A Success
PhD student Luke Bancroft reports on a recent conference hosted jointly at Monash Prato and…
GTReC/NBTC Training 2013
On 12th November, 2013, the Global Terrorism Research Centre (GTReC) at Monash University completed a…
Talks tackle terrorism – and look to peace
Preventing terrorism by deradicalising and disengaging militants will be discussed during a symposium currently being…
Grant successes for GES scholars
GES academics have recently successfully landed a number of research grants, from both the Australian…
Is everything becoming a ‘Science’? Next up: geographical science, poverty reduction science…
By Christian Kull Is everything becoming a ‘Science’ these days? Land change science, sustainability science,…
Public Seminar by Professor Tore Bjørgo
Tore Bjørgo is Professor of Police Science at the Norwegian Police University College and…
Scrutinising images associated with human smuggling: the bigger picture
The experience of asylum seekers’ risky and dangerous boat journey to Australia was at the…
Pianist tickles the ivories to success
A Monash University jazz pianist has impressed the judges to take top prize at the…