Defensive homicide applies to killers who unreasonably believed their actions were necessary to defend themselves or others; many are women who are victims of family violence.
The study, by researchers from Monash University and Domestic Violence Resource Centre Victoria, examined eight cases of women charged with killing their partners since defensive homicide was introduced by the former Labor government in 2005. The study found family violence was still poorly understood and the perception of what is ‘reasonable’ self-defence continues to be shaped by gender-based stereotypes.
Monash University criminology expert Dr Danielle Tyson from the School of Political and Social Inquiry said there still remained a failure to understand how prior family violence may affect women’s responses and why victims may remain in abusive relationships.
“If defensive homicide is abolished and no other partial defence is established to replace it, it is likely that some women who kill in the context of family violence will receive harsher sentences than is currently the case,” Dr Tyson said.
“The current limited recognition of family violence gives us little confidence that women will successfully be able to claim self-defence at trial.”
Dr Tyson said the need for law reform to ensure justice for women who kill violent partners has been well established for some decades.
“Currently defensive homicide is being used more often by men who kill other men and rarely by women, but the reliance on partial defences or manslaughter by men who kill other men is nothing new and not a sound reason to abolish defensive homicide,” Dr Tyson said.
“Victoria has led the way for other Australian jurisdictions in its commitment to bringing about more positive changes for women defendants.
“We need to continue our efforts to develop the law in a way that adequately recognises the impact of family violence on women’s lives, but also to work with the legal profession to improve the applications of the law so that the spirit and potential of legislative reform can be effectively realised.”
Dr Tyson said that until women victims of family violence can be seen to be successfully raising self-defence, defensive homicide should not be abolished.
“We need to see further shifts in the legal profession and culture around the recognition of family violence and women’s responses to it. At present, there is no evidence that women’s prospects of raising self-defence successfully have improved,” Dr Tyson said.
“There is still a long way to go to improve legal responses for women who kill an abusive partner and this won’t be achieved if the current laws are abolished.”
Find out more:
- School of Political and Social Inquiry
- The Centre for Women’s Studies and Gender Research (CWSGR)
No prospect of release: Kevin Crump and the human rights implications of life imprisonment
Kate Fitz-Gibbon, Monash University and Wendy O’Brien, Deakin University A NSW court last week dismissed … Continue reading No prospect of release: Kevin Crump and the human rights implications of life imprisonment
Mutated conventions: how secrecy in the name of security harms democracy
Jude McCulloch (Monash Criminology) Secrecy is anathema to democracy. Without transparency, government may contravene its … Continue reading Mutated conventions: how secrecy in the name of security harms democracy
Criminology’s Marie Segrave co-edits Anti-Trafficking Review special issue
Monash’s Dr Marie Segrave (Criminology), recently edited a Special Issue of Anti-Trafficking Review, focused on … Continue reading Criminology’s Marie Segrave co-edits Anti-Trafficking Review special issue
I would build… radical strategies for resisting the harms of reform
Dr Bree Carlton, from Criminology in the School of Social Sciences, asks whether penal reform … Continue reading I would build… radical strategies for resisting the harms of reform
Building prisons is not making us safe – what can government do?
Marie Segrave The Victorian Ombudsman, Deborah Glass, last week released a report into the rehabilitation … Continue reading Building prisons is not making us safe – what can government do?
Crimonology’s Dr Asher Flynn one of the leading experts discussing Victoria’s new rape laws
On 1 July 2015, major reforms came into effect that sought to simplify Victoria’s notoriously … Continue reading Crimonology’s Dr Asher Flynn one of the leading experts discussing Victoria’s new rape laws
Monash Criminology: Researching the internal border
The furore surrounding Operation Fortitude has brought into sharp focus the operation of Australia’s internal … Continue reading Monash Criminology: Researching the internal border
Operation Fortitude: it’s not just clumsy wording that should worry us
Leanne Weber The news that the newly formed Australian Border Force (ABF) was partnering Victoria … Continue reading Operation Fortitude: it’s not just clumsy wording that should worry us
Monash Criminlogy travels to British Criminology Conference
Monash Criminology was well represented at all levels at this year’s British Criminology Conference in Plymouth, … Continue reading Monash Criminlogy travels to British Criminology Conference
Radzinwicz Prize Win for Criminlogy’s Prof Sharon Pickering and Julie Ham
Director of the Border Crossing Observatory Professor Sharon Pickering (Criminology), alongside co-author Julie Ham, who recently submitted her … Continue reading Radzinwicz Prize Win for Criminlogy’s Prof Sharon Pickering and Julie Ham
Publication: New book on international students and crime
International Students and Crime by Helen Forbes-Mewett (Sociology), Jude McCulloch (Criminology) and Chris Nylan (International … Continue reading Publication: New book on international students and crime
State of imprisonment: Victoria is leading the nation backwards
by Dr Marie Segrave, Dr Anna Eriksson and Emma Russell This article is part of The Conversation’s series, State … Continue reading State of imprisonment: Victoria is leading the nation backwards