Multidisciplinary symposium ● 9.00am–5.00pm Thursday July 18, 2013 ● Monash Conference Centre Level 7, 30 Collins Street, Melbourne
Only the US and New Zealand allow direct to consumer advertising of prescription pharmaceuticals (DTCA). Supporters argue DTCA is an extension of free speech and creates awareness of medical treatments. Opponents say DTCA misleads and frustrates effective medicine choices. Yet debate has overlooked new research on how advertising persuades, often outside of awareness. Key questions addressed at the symposium:
How do advances in consumer psychology inform the ethics of DTCA?
What are the implications for public policy on DTCA in the US and New Zealand?
What are the implications for Australia’s ban on DTCA and for permissible medical and pharmaceutical
advertising in this country?
0915-1000 Evaluative conditioning and the ethics of pharmaceutical advertising
1000-1030 Does scepticism about rational agency undermine the arguments against the use of
implicit persuasion in DTCA?
1030-1045 Morning Tea
1045-1115 Libertarianism and Direct to Consumer Advertising of Prescription Drugs
1115-1145 The role of evaluative conditioning in the relationship between doctors and the pharmaceutical
1145-1215 The case for DTCA – Improving patient autonomy and engagement
1300-1330 Preserving ethical physician prescribing behaviour when pharmaceutical advertising uses
implicit persuasion: Some issues and policy suggestions
1330-1500 Panel Discussion
Geoff McColl, Ken Harvey, Fiona Jolly, John Dowden, Liz Marles, Kate Browne
1500-1515 Closing comments
1515-1530 Afternoon Tea
Monash research positions available
Three Graduate Research positions are now open in the School of Philosophical, Historical and International … Continue reading Monash research positions available
Killer Robots: Professor Robert Sparrow
In October 2016, acclaimed Professor Stephen Hawking warned against the rapid development of artificial intelligence, … Continue reading Killer Robots: Professor Robert Sparrow
Global Bioethics: A conversation with Professor Michael Selgelid
Professor Michael Selgelid is the Director of the Monash Bioethics Centre (formerly named Centre for … Continue reading Global Bioethics: A conversation with Professor Michael Selgelid
Small viruses, big questions: Ethical responses to Zika and Ebola
The Zika virus has been a concern for 2016 Olympics in Rio, Professor Michael Selgelid considers the complex ethical issues such viruses present.
Congratulations to Evie Kendal, winner of the 2016 Faculty of Arts 3-Minute Thesis Competition
3MT is an academic competition that sees graduate research students from across Australia and the … Continue reading Congratulations to Evie Kendal, winner of the 2016 Faculty of Arts 3-Minute Thesis Competition
What are the real risks of Zika?
by Michael Selgelid and Euzebiusz Jamrozik
Zika has raised alarm bells worldwide, prompting the World Health Organisation’s (WHO) declaration…
States have no right to stop anyone wanting to access IVF
Ryan Tonkens There’s no moral difference between people who have children “naturally” and those who … Continue reading States have no right to stop anyone wanting to access IVF
Winners announced for Faculty of Arts Postgraduate Publication Prize
The Faculty of Arts extends its congratulations to Julian Koplin who was recently awarded the … Continue reading Winners announced for Faculty of Arts Postgraduate Publication Prize
The ethics of ‘gifted’ genes: the road to Gattaca?
by Julian Savulescu Recent research out of the UK has identified a genetic “general academic … Continue reading The ethics of ‘gifted’ genes: the road to Gattaca?
Illusion aids understanding of autism
New research could lead to a better understanding of how the brain works in people … Continue reading Illusion aids understanding of autism
Public lecture: Can morality be manipulated?
A world leader in practical ethics will discuss human moral limitations and their impact on … Continue reading Public lecture: Can morality be manipulated?
Antidepressants may be no better than a placebo, so why take them?
by Paul Biegler Seventeenth-century Oxford scholar Robert Burton’s lifework,The Anatomy of Melancholy, weighs in at … Continue reading Antidepressants may be no better than a placebo, so why take them?