The contrast in the way modern societies punish offenders and the factors driving their approaches to crime has been investigated by researchers in their new book.
In their book, Contrasts in Punishment: An Explanation of Anglophone Excess and Nordic Exceptionalism, authors Dr Anna Eriksson, Monash University, and Professor John Pratt, Victoria Universitiy, draw on their decade-long research into the reasons behind contrasting attitudes to punishment in Anglophone and Nordic societies.
They analyse the development and current practice of the penal systems of England, Australia, New Zealand in contrast with Finland, Norway and Sweden. The authors argue that from the early 19th century onwards, Anglophone societies were dominated by value systems of division, intolerance and exclusion in contrast to high levels of social inclusion promoted by the Nordic.
Dr Eriksson said differences between the two clusters of societies are illustrated in their prison rates – Anglophone countries had some of the highest incarceration rates, and the Nordic countries the lowest, of those countries in the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD).
“In the Nordic countries, there is a belief that prison conditions should recreate the outside world as much as possible,” Dr Eriksson said.
“Norway’s recently opened Halden Prison is a high-security jail where every cell has a television, en suite bathrooms, unbarred windows and designer furniture. Guards are unarmed and prisoners complete questionnaires asking how their prison experience can be improved.”
Dr Eriksson said it would be impossible to think of such a prison in the Anglophone countries, including Australia.
“Here, prison administration has come to be dominated by issues of security and control, in conjunction with overcrowded, deteriorating conditions,” Dr Eriksson said.
“The contrast in punishment could be illustrated well in the aftermath of the mass murder commited by Anders Behring Breivik in Oslo 2011.
“Such an event in Australia would most likely have called for a reintroduction of the death penalty, and wide-ranging punitive legislation to prevent such events in the future. In Norway, this exceptional crime was recognised with the emphasis on reaffirming solidarity, democray and unity.”
Professor Pratt said the reasons punishment is viewed so differently in the two clusters lies in the pattern of social arrangements developed over the last 200 years.
“The Nordic countries have become very socially inclusive and place high value on moderation, restraint and egalitarianism,” Professor Pratt said.
“In contrast, Anglophone societies became much more exclusionary as a result of an emphasis on individual responsibility and the accumulation of wealth and property.”
Professor Pratt said state power in Nordic countries tends to be used protectively and preventatively in the form of welfare, social and educational provisions.
“In the Anglophone countries, despite all the political emphasis on ‘getting the state out of people’s lives’, there have been few qualms about using state power negatively and punitively against those thought to be unwanted or troublesome,” Professor Pratt said.
Excellence in research by Monash Criminology recognised in 2016 Dean’s Awards
Two of this year’s coveted Dean’s awards have been taken out by Monash Criminology researchers. A … Continue reading Excellence in research by Monash Criminology recognised in 2016 Dean’s Awards
Monash Criminology at Australian Academy of Sciences High Flyers Think Tank
Criminology’s Dr Marie Segrave (DECRA Fellow, School of Social Sciences) as well as Dr Lesley … Continue reading Monash Criminology at Australian Academy of Sciences High Flyers Think Tank
New Article Challenging the Abolition of Defensive Homicide
Monash Criminology PhD candidate Maddy Ulbrick has co-authored an article with her supervisors, Dr Asher … Continue reading New Article Challenging the Abolition of Defensive Homicide
Transforming prison experiences into theatre
Dr Anna Eriksson has contributed to an exciting new theatrical project The Chat, in which ex-prisoners … Continue reading Transforming prison experiences into theatre
PhD Scholarship Success for Criminology’s Madeleine Ulbrick
Monash Criminology doctoral student, tutor and research assistant, Madeleine Ulbrick, has recently been awarded a … Continue reading PhD Scholarship Success for Criminology’s Madeleine Ulbrick
Monash research on human security featured on Radio National
Findings from the Fluid Security in the Asia Pacific project featured recently in a program on the … Continue reading Monash research on human security featured on Radio National
Monash research examines whether child homicide offenders should be named
Monash criminologist Dr Kate Fitz-Gibbon and Deakin criminologist Dr Wendy O’Brien have authored a new … Continue reading Monash research examines whether child homicide offenders should be named
Congratulations to our newest Doctor of Philosophy in Criminology – Dr Christina Kirtley
Dr Christina Kirtley has been part of the Monash Criminology cohort since she was an … Continue reading Congratulations to our newest Doctor of Philosophy in Criminology – Dr Christina Kirtley
Seeing borders from the perspectives of criminology and visual arts
Associate Professor Leanne Weber has joined with visual artists and curators to discuss contemporary borders … Continue reading Seeing borders from the perspectives of criminology and visual arts
Will technology make ‘thought policing’ a reality?
Professor Jude McCulloch’s research and co-authored book ‘Pre-Crime: Preemption, precaution and the future‘ featured in … Continue reading Will technology make ‘thought policing’ a reality?
New report on legal responses to intimate partner homicide
Drs Debbie Kirkwood and Danielle Tyson, both research fellows in Criminology in the School of … Continue reading New report on legal responses to intimate partner homicide
Another contribution to the budget and family violence debate
Today the Age published an opinion piece by the Gender and Family Violence team about … Continue reading Another contribution to the budget and family violence debate